Hi,
Looks like some 'override' keywords crept into a few destructors. This
is probably because clang-tidy warns about it (and now QtCreator).
IMO we should avoid it, as it's misleading. Dtors are a special case and
have completely different semantics. They don't replace their base class
dtors. They're chained instead.
This is not 100% consensual, some people like to use it.
But it's discouraged by the Cpp Core Guidelines [1] ; gcc's
-Wsuggest-override doesn't suggest it for dtors and neither does clang's
-Winconsistent-missing-override.
So clang-tidy is the one odd out.
I'll update the coding conventions if nobody opposes.
[1] -
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#Rh-override
Regards,
--
Sérgio Martins | sergio.mart...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company
Tel: Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090, USA +1-866-777-KDAB(5322)
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
