On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 02:29:15 PDT Uwe Rathmann wrote: > I also googled for QT_XCB_NATIVE_PAINTING without almost no results. I > understand, that reverting a decision is not stuff for big announcements, > but for such an important improvement: has it been communicated at least > somewhere ?
Because it's not an important improvement for most people. Your case and Denis's, as seen in this thread, are very specific. Most people are fine with the raster engine. > It also raises questions about the status of the X11 paint engine. > Several bugs have been closed because of not fixing the X11 paint engine > anymore. This being the reason why the X11 engine is not good for everyone. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
