On 31. Oct 2018, at 06:38, Bogdan Vatra via Development <development@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org>> wrote:
Hi, În ziua de marți, 30 octombrie 2018, la 19:11:20 EET, Oswald Buddenhagen a scris: On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 01:16:43PM +0200, Bogdan Vatra wrote: c.2) back then, none of the existing build system could deliver enough information to IDEs to enable prefect code completion (e.g. include paths, defines, compiler flags, etc.) ... c.2) Incomplete! A while ago, I created a QBS plugin for KDevelop[1] and I found some problems, see how QBS developers treat them here: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QBS-902 . That was the moment when I started to have doubts :). for all i can tell that's a rather poor bug report with little followup from you. that's where i start to have doubts whether you actually mean it. ;) You must be kidding! What do you want me to do more? Write some love poems? This kind of reaction on https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QBS-902 is the normal experience i encounter when submitting Qt-Bugs, so IMHO this is not related to the importance of qbs as a project but best practise. Cheers, Maximilian
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
