Just answered. As I said my email does not functioning (disabled), so did not see the question. Actually initial bug description contains full url.
-- Best regards, Aleksey Linked in https://www.linkedin.com/in/alekseykontsevich 07.01.2019, 10:44, "Denis Kormalev" <kormalev.de...@gmail.com>: > I would at least suggest to answer Ekkehard and BogDan in QTBUG-72687. They > are waiting for 4 days for answer from you. > > -- > Regards, > Denis Kormalev > >> On Jan 7, 2019, at 12:08 AM, Aleksey Kontsevich <tantr...@ya.ru> wrote: >> >> Very strange. May I move them to P0-Blocker then? :) >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Aleksey >> Linked in https://www.linkedin.com/in/alekseykontsevich >> >> 07.01.2019, 07:37, "Jani Heikkinen" <jani.heikki...@qt.io>: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> On Behalf Of >>>> Aleksey Kontsevich >>>> Sent: lauantai 5. tammikuuta 2019 12.23 >>>> To: ekke <e...@ekkes-corner.org>; developm...@lists.qt-project.org >>>> Subject: Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.12' to '5.12.1' >>>> started >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> What about QTBUG-72687 and QTBUG-72227? >>> >>> QTBUG-72687 or QTBUG-72227 aren't really a release blocker, sorry. >>> >>> br, >>> Jani >> _______________________________________________ >> Development mailing list >> Development@qt-project.org >> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
