On Thursday, 17 January 2019 15:11:13 CET Edward Welbourne wrote: >Tuukka Turunen (17 January 2019 15:00) >> I think best would be to do the API review in codereview tool
> As I suspect you're thinking of the API reviews I create in the run-up > to a release, I feel obliged to point out these are really API *change* > reviews. I suspect that Tuukka did mean an actual code review, and not the header-diff- sanity-check, but he can speak for himself. I'm taking the opportunity to yet again point out that the term "API review" has a long history inside and outside of the Qt Project, and we need another name for the just-before-release check. This misunderstanding shows that the risk of miscommunication is not merely theoretical. - Paul (aka. Cato the Elder) _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
