On Sat, 26 Jan 2019, Olivier Goffart wrote:
I think the "monorepo" is clearly a good approach. And git is evolving with
shadow clones and partial checkout. LLVM/Clang recently choose the monorepo
approach as it moves to git.
Of one problem is that this will make CI integration slower because each CI
run now have to test both qtbase and qtdeclarative tests.
I've started to develop sympathy for "monorepos" during the last years. To
counter often expressed fears like excessive build and test times one has
to point out:
Bigger (or even single) repositories do NOT mean
- monolithic builds and test runs
- monolithic packaging
Developers and packagers are free to model logical segements according to
their needs.
Harri.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
