> I think what Jesus refers to is patch level releases. Yes, I was referring to patch releases.
And I think we started providing binaries for a platform in 5.12.0 we cannot stop providing them in 5.12.x. Best regards, Jesús ________________________________ From: Jani Heikkinen Sent: 06 February 2019 11:02 To: Maurice Kalinowski; Simon Hausmann; Jesus Fernandez Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Intention of dropping UWP 2015 x86 builds in favour of MinGW 32-bit packages Hi, As Simon already wrote this is affecting only prebuilt binary packages we deliver and nothing else. It is true that we usually haven't touched (at least removed) those in patch level releases but I don't see any big issue with doing this now; UWP x86 msvc 2015 isn't that widely used and feedback from dropping mingw 32 bit is coming just from 5.12 series... br, Jani ________________________________________ From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Maurice Kalinowski <maurice.kalinow...@qt.io> Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 11:32 AM To: Simon Hausmann; Jesus Fernandez Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Intention of dropping UWP 2015 x86 builds in favour of MinGW 32-bit packages I think what Jesus refers to is patch level releases. We’ve been changing binary packages for platforms within minor releases so far, but not for patch level ones. Maurice From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> On Behalf Of Simon Hausmann Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 9:19 AM To: Jesus Fernandez <jesus.fernan...@qt.io> Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Intention of dropping UWP 2015 x86 builds in favour of MinGW 32-bit packages Afaik this merely affects the binaries provided in the installer. It does not result in any changes in the git repos. Simon On 5. Feb 2019, at 16:03, Jesus Fernandez <jesus.fernan...@qt.io<mailto:jesus.fernan...@qt.io>> wrote: Can we remove a platform in a minor version? Best regards, Jesús -------- Original message -------- From: Harald Kjølberg <harald.kjolb...@qt.io<mailto:harald.kjolb...@qt.io>> Date: 05/02/2019 15:56 (GMT+01:00) To: development@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org> Subject: Re: [Development] Intention of dropping UWP 2015 x86 builds in favour of MinGW 32-bit packages Hi, As no objections have been received, the proposed change will be implemented, effective from Qt 5.12.2. Cheers, Harald From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org<mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org>> on behalf of Harald Kjølberg <harald.kjolb...@qt.io<mailto:harald.kjolb...@qt.io>> Date: Tuesday, 22 January 2019 at 14:36 To: "development@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org>" <development@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org>> Subject: [Development] Intention of dropping UWP 2015 x86 builds in favour of MinGW 32-bit packages Hi, In order to improve transparency and visibility (after getting some constructive and well deserved criticism): We have received a proposal of dropping UWP 2015 x86 builds in favour of MinGW 32-bit packages. We looked at this today and agreed that this can be done, and it should be our intention to do so. We will make the final decision February 5th, and it will remain as described unless we get a lot of feedback saying that we should do otherwise. For further details: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-73019 Regards, Harald Kjølberg _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org<mailto:Development@qt-project.org> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
