Looks nice! From an API perspective I would call the provider APIs fail(...) and succeed(...) instead of reject(...) and resolve(...), and the corresponding consumer APIs onSucceeded(...) and onFailed(...) (or whenSucceeded(...) / whenFailed(...)). Or something else that makes the connection between the two clear.
But that's just my 2 cents. Cheers, Elvis Den mån 11 feb. 2019 kl 12:50 skrev Juan Gonzalez Burgos <juangbur...@gmail.com>: > > Hi guys, > > Sorry to bother you with yet another promise/deferred library for Qt. I am > looking for feedback. > > https://github.com/juangburgos/QDeferred > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
