> Since its company-internal, the answer likely doesn't matter to you. But it > doesn't have CI. If a repository is worth having CI for, it should go to > Gerrit. >
Thanks for replying anyway. Interesting. I was looking for a (semi-)open and maintainable CI solution that I could propose for Qbs. Not using gerrit is not an option. But the Qt Company seems to lack of an easy-to-use CI solution for this kind of project and the current amount of contributors. Richard _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
