True, but it’s ownership is never transferred, so it’s out of the scope of discussion - user is free to use any c++ idiom he likes. I would like to discuss how to transfer ownership in modern Qt.
> 6 мая 2019 г., в 9:30, Christian Kandeler <christian.kande...@qt.io> > написал(а): > > On Sat, 04 May 2019 09:06:39 +0200 > Allan Sandfeld Jensen <k...@carewolf.com> wrote: > >> On Samstag, 4. Mai 2019 00:43:10 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> On Friday, 3 May 2019 13:00:52 PDT Иван Комиссаров wrote: >>>> Which should be considered bad practice and banned on an API level >>> >>> No way. >>> >>> Are you going to forbid creation of QFile on the stack? >> >> Perhaps QFile shouldn't be the same kind of base object type as QWidgets? Or >> not use the same smart pointer. >> >> Though even making QWidgets not allowed on the stack, while sensible, would >> break a many of our tests, where we "abuse" that it is technically possible >> in >> simple cases. > > Doesn't almost every project create its main widget on the stack? > > > Christian > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
