> Please consider the wider use-case too
Ok, we will. So, is it a "go"?
--
Vladimir
On 10.05.19, 12:12, "Tor Arne Vestbø" <tor.arne.ves...@qt.io> wrote:
> On 10 May 2019, at 12:04, Kevin Funk <kevin.f...@kdab.com> wrote:
>
> Kind of inconsistent with the naming of all other Qt module repositories,
> which all start with a "qt”.
Right, that’s what I meant, sorry 😊
> On Friday, 10 May 2019 10:38:17 CEST Minenko, Vladimir wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the current implementation is focused on the use with Qt Quick. This is
w/o
>> saying that this topic does not have a future "below" the UI level. That
>> makes sense, it is just not existent yet.
Please consider the wider use-case too 😊
Tor Arne
________________________________
This e-mail and any attachment(s) are intended only for the recipient(s) named
above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive them. They
may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient,
please do not read this email or its attachment(s). Furthermore, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any
attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then
delete this e-mail and any attachment(s) or copies thereof from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
