True. I am just trying to provide alternative view. I am perhaps overexaggerating a bit, but I still think this is something that needs to be considered. And yeah, QList=QArrayList should definitely be a default setting
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 9:00 PM Giuseppe D'Angelo <giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com> wrote: > Il 22/05/19 19:29, NIkolai Marchenko ha scritto: > > I do not see how this addresses the issue. You are pushing the decision > > to use the compile switch or not on the same userbase who couldn't be > > bothered to port away from qlist in the first place. > > You are essenitally asking: "Are you sure you aren't using qlist in > > specific ways?" > > And the likely answer in the end will be "Eh, oooops ... hehehe" > > > > People will use the "faster" non compatible compilation switch and > > *will* break their code. It won't be Qt's fault but it *will* be > > perceived as such. > > This is highly debatable. Sure, there's lots of cargo cult mentality in > the software industry, and this could be used to shift the blame on Qt. > On the other hand there's only so much we can do in terms of warning > users about the consequences of flipping the switch in their _pre > existing_ code base. > > (Switch that I'd like to keep in the QList=QArrayList by default.) > > My 2 c, > -- > Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer > KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company > Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com > KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts > >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
