Maybe flatpak is the way to go? There could be two runtimes. Personally I use more and more flatpaks because I get up-to-date packages provided by the developers.
On May 24, 2019 19:59:52 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 10:53, Lars Knoll <lars.kn...@qt.io> wrote: > [snip] >> I’m not proposing to make QList inherit QVector. Actually, I’m making it an >> alias to QVector. See https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/242692 >> . >> >> >> With that, one option could be to make the alias dependent on a compile time >> setting for the application code (ie. have a simple define whether we do >> >> >> using QList = QVector >> >> >> Or >> >> >> using QList = Qt5Support::QList > > That would actually be painful for distros. Once we take either route > we can't go back without breaking ABI. And we will possibly be > choosing different things in each distro, which makes it even worst. > Example: qreal in Qt5. > > I really think Marc Mutz's approach would be more sensible in this case. > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development