On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:44:31PM +0200, Mutz, Marc via Development wrote: > On 2019-05-29 13:52, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > 29.05.2019, 13:56, "Mutz, Marc via Development" > > <[email protected]>: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Here's a list of stuff I consider has served it's purpose and is no > > > longer needed, with respective replacements: > > > > > > = Priority 1 = > > > > > > == QSharedDataPointer / QExplicitlySharedDataPointer == > > > > It seems like you've forgotten migration path here. > > > > Or are all those who use intrusive reference counting in their classes > > on their own since now? > > Do you actually think it's Qt's job to define how _you_ implement your > classes?
Qt doesn't do that. Nobody is forced to use QSharedDataPointer or QExplicitlySharedDataPointer for their classes. > In my projects, I've _always_ written my own pimpl_ptr, because I > might want to use it in backend components that don't use Qt. [...] The fact that you personally don't use it does neither imply that it useless for everyone else, nor is that a reason for deprecation. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
