On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 at 10:10, Allan Sandfeld Jensen <k...@carewolf.com> wrote: [snip] > > > I have no problem with breaking ABI more often but allowing it in every minor > releases probably goes to far. Perhaps every second LTS (every 3 years), might > be better.
That would work as long as related applications (moc, linguist stuff, etc) remain either **fully** backwards compatible within the major version *or* they are also marked with the minor. For example instead of shipping moc6 one could ship moc6.<API/ABI stable LTS>, like let's say moc60, moc66 or alike. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
