On 22/08/2019 15.09, Danila Malyutin wrote: > Can't it be alleviated/improved by providing user-defined literal for > QString(Literal)? So that one would only write a["b"_qs] = "c"_qs.
No; there is no (portable) way in C++17 (and I think still in C++20) for a UDL's return type to depend on the size (string length) of its input, which is required to implement QString literals. (I've tried...) -- Matthew _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
