On Friday, 6 September 2019 09:39:32 PDT Edward Welbourne wrote: > Thiago Macieira (6 September 2019 16:58) > > > I also don't understand what we need to reduce. Having the current stable, > > current post-feature-freeze and the current in-development branches have > > always been the norm. The only new thing is the Qt 6 branch ("dev"), which > > does not need frequent merging. > > We're currently merging (after the final 5.12->5.13 merge) > 5.13 -> 5.14 -> 5.15 -> dev > with incidental extra merges to and from release branches as they come and > go. That gets to be somewhat burdensome for whoever is looking after > merges.
You're repeating what I said. We have the normal situation (5.13→5.14→5.15) and the Qt6 branch. Qt6 does not need to be merged often, or at worst can sustain lower merge rates until Christmas. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel System Software Products _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development