Are we really considering abandoning the parent-child ownership for qt6 ? that would be a huge breaking change
> > I would like to separate pointers with simple ownership and complicated > > ownership. We could solve passing of raw pointers with simple ownership > > first using standard smart pointers. Where as the more complicated > pointers > would require special classes like those Daniel Teske has been > working on. I'm not sure how to properly identify what is the "complicated > ownership". I don't think that there are places in Qt API where we really > need something more complicated than regular shared/weak/unique pointers. > Even intrusive pointers are not required I guess. When you think about > something more complicated, this is probably an architectural problem (like > with parent-child) or bad API design. Can you provide some real examples > where we need something more complicated than regular smart pointers, please? _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development