On Samstag, 1. Februar 2020 00:31:17 CET Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > On 31/01/2020 23:47, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > >> The question stays: how do we call a unique_ptr equivalent? > > > > QScopedPointer? ;) > > That name was precisely the reason why the idea of adding movability was > shot down. I know something about it: I proposed that some 6 years ago! > To me the name is still perfect. It makes perfect sense. Just because it is movable doesn't mean you move the object itself, a move moves the content of the object. So each move triggers a move of the payload of a scoped pointer to another scoped pointer in another scope.
I never understood why anyone would think the name would make that impossible. 'Allan _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development