Recently this has caused me much consternation. I think QtQuick everything should have a parent, and a visual parent, though I appreciate how tedious this would be. They should be the same except when they can't and having separate properties would highlight that.
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2020 at 10:33 AM > From: "Mitch Curtis" <mitch.cur...@qt.io> > To: "Vitaly Fanaskov" <vitaly.fanas...@qt.io>, "Konrad Rosenbaum" > <kon...@silmor.de>, "development@qt-project.org" <development@qt-project.org> > Subject: Re: [Development] The future of smart pointers in Qt API > > > Vitaly Fanaskov > > > > [...] In this case, I think we won't have this confusing definitions like > > "visual > > parent" and "just a parent" > > (that we have in controls). > > Sorry, couldn't resist: visual parent vs QObject parent is a distinction that > Qt Quick made, not Qt Quick Controls. > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development > _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
