Il 03/02/20 17:56, Jason H ha scritto:
As a result, the code of a Qt-using program should be readable by average developers not big into C++.
But no one is imposing super-advanced C++ features on Qt users and Qt applications...
Meanwhile, it also does not serve anyone to duplicate stl. I do not know where the threshold is for duplication (probably pretty high) but I would encourage the threshold to be low for augmentation.
I've asked "what's wrong with the C++ smart pointers" a dozen times and never received a satisfactory answer.
As a counter-example: I didn't complain at all about having a QFuture with a different feature set than std::future (cf. the other thread on this topic). Why is that? Because std::future lacks critical features (e.g. continuations); QFuture aims at filling that gap, and I'm super-fine with that. Do you see me complaining about QString vs u16string?
My 2 c, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
smime.p7s
Description: Firma crittografica S/MIME
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
