On 12/02/20 15:20, Vitaly Fanaskov wrote: >> AFAIK, we don't have a procedure to make project-level decisions by majority >> vote. > True. We're discussing now. The goal here is to take people opinions and > arguments into account before making a decision.
The problem I see, is that in your summary you are only reporting those options that have had more consensus (or at least, according to the way you perceived the discussion going); but in doing so, you are already filtering out the alternatives, and therefore paving the road for a decision. Maybe what we should do is to collect all the different proposals and let people fill them with pros and cons (wiki style) and then you can proceed with a decision? In this way, you'd also avoid people repeating the same positions over and over the place. (not that I have a positive experience with the wiki approach either; but at least you are sure that all people taking the decision will be aware of all the points for and against every alternative). Ciao, Alberto -- http://www.mardy.it - Geek in un lingua international _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
