On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 14:42, Lars Knoll <lars.kn...@qt.io> wrote: > But we could convey the information that this is a signal you’re calling > *reliably* through other means. This implies that the keyword is not required.
Was the keyword ever required? Seems like it's just a taste difference from a qEmit(my_signal()); to write emit my_signal(); The first one can be namespaced, and thus its name lookup controlled. It also never clashes with a member name. Its worse aesthetics aside, if we'd had that since the beginning, we wouldn't be talking about the current clashes with std::osyncstream. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
