On Monday, 24 February 2020 03:30:25 PST André Somers wrote: >>>> You seem to assume everyone used QtCreator as their IDE of >>>> choice. That is not a reasonable assumption I think.
On 27/02/2020 13.57, Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> It is a reasonable feature request for ALL IDEs to understand what a >>> Qt signal is. On Thursday, 27 February 2020 21:43:33 CET Matthew Woehlke wrote: >> Really? You include github/gitlab/phabricator in that list? Vim? >> Notepad++? Allan Sandfeld Jensen (27 February 2020 23:01) replied > I would be surprised if any of those didn't. I see that emacs in fact colours emit green and the next word yellow (I think it's mistaking it for a declaration, as it colours types green and identifiers yellow in those), but if I remove emit it doesn't do anything special with the signal invocation. So I think that counts as emacs not knowing what signals are, although it does do something, albeit probably bogus, with the "keyword" when used. Whether one counts emacs, vim or notepad++ as an IDE is, however, another story ! I read Thiago as talking about things that *call themselves* IDEs, rather than text editors. Even so, asking MSVS to support Qt-specific features ... sounds ambitious - good luck ;^> Eddy. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development