On Mittwoch, 9. September 2020 10:17:25 CEST Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Mittwoch, 9. September 2020 09:14:29 CEST Lars Knoll wrote: > > Hi Allan, > > > > On 7 Sep 2020, at 12:59, Allan Sandfeld Jensen > > <k...@carewolf.com<mailto:k...@carewolf.com>> wrote: > > > > On Mittwoch, 26. August 2020 08:46:41 CEST Lars Knoll wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This is just a gentle reminder that feature freeze for Qt 6 is approaching > > very quickly now. We’ve had a round of checks inside the Qt Company > > regarding how ready the teams are. All in all it looks relatively good, so > > we’ll keep the feature freeze at the 1st of September. > > > > There are three areas that have asked for an exception to the freeze to > > finish things that are still pending: > > > > * In QtCore, the Q*Iterables in qmetatype/qvariant > > * Across Gui/Declarative/QuickControls the input system > > * The new desktop styling for Qt Quick Controls > > * The new property system (see separate mail; most likely it won’t need an > > extension to the freeze date) > > > > Not sure if this falls under the input system, but I had left this since > > March > > due to conflicts with other changes, > > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/291214/5 > > Not sure what to do about this one. I am not convinced this is the right > > thing to do, as at least QAction is not really a key binding (you can have > > an action without a shortcut), so the inheritance looks wrong in my eyes. > > Okay, the idea is that it _can_ be, so it is more like an interface > inheritance. > Though I guess I could change it to a 'has a' dependency, though I would prefer to still make the two APIs naming consistent.
'Allan _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
