Hi! On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 12:55, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > > On Monday, 9 November 2020 09:57:13 PST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > wrote: > > Seriously, we have discussed this before, and we kind of agreed that > > user-facing applications should either be really backwards compatible > > or should have the tool suffixed with the qt version. Whatever other > > option is just pain for maintainers, be it trough qtchooser or by > > letting us renaming tools ourselves. > > Lisandro, Kevin, other packagers in the list: > > May I suggest you get together and make a proposal? If you can get a patch > into Gerrit, great. If not, then post the cmake command-line that Linux > distributions will use. We need the distributions to be consistent with each > other. > > Post to this list what the Qt 6 Linux distributions packages will install and > what the layout will be. Whether the default builds do the same or not is > irrelevant. It's your choice and can go against the default build. > > This is important for KDE Frameworks 6 and other software that mostly builds > from distro packages will likely adopt for its reference documentation.
I like the idea. I have not touched Qt 6 yet (I'm very sadly not going to be able to maintain it) but I think this is actually a nice thing to do. I'll reach my co-maintainers and ask there. Kevin: can you do the same? -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development