On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 10:17, Alexander Nassian < nass...@bitshift-dynamics.com> wrote:
> 4) Don‘t release a major version that lacks half of the modules of the > prev version in a hurry for no reason. > Especially just after deciding to remove the concept of LTS for open source users, effectively creating a 1 year gap between 2 equivalent releases of Qt (5.15.2 -> 6.2.0). Back to the topic, wouldn't it be acceptable to break BC before 6.2 release? I mean Qt 6 isn't really complete until 6.2, so if a break is required it kind of makes sense to make it happen before everyone has made the switch from Qt 5 to Qt 6. My 2 cents Benjamin
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
