Hi! On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 13:13, Kai Köhne <kai.koe...@qt.io> wrote: [snip] > > In fact the most difficult people to convince are within tqtc. And no, we > > have been asking for this change, specifically for qt6, > > since at very least 2019. And they where no small threads. > > That might have less to do with the fact we work for The Qt Company, but more > with the fact that a) you ask us to do the work, and b) to maintain it
For (a) I can feel some guilt, but sadly having to get the paycheck has become more important nowadays :-/ For (b): the renaming, at very least on Linux (although Homebrew really needs it too), no matter the source of the binaries, is just the right thing to do. > Anyhow, now that we've been both venting our frustration a bit: As Joerg > already pointed out, I'm completely fine with the patch he has prepared, and > certainly do hope that distributions make use of it. I'm just disagreeing > with the request that the Qt documentation need also state 'qmake6' > everywhere, and that the Qt SDK (as provided by the online installer) needs > to contain 'qmake6', too. Well, it seems we will keep disagreeing for quite some time then :-) -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
