Why wouldn’t they simply have two versions of Qt ( or more) the one they are targeting for desktop, and the previous one they are targeting for android/"remote"
-----Original Message----- From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> On Behalf Of Joerg Bornemann Sent: Friday, November 5, 2021 2:28 AM To: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilshei...@qt.io> Cc: Macieira, Thiago <thiago.macie...@intel.com>; development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] moc output from non-local tool build On 11/5/21 12:06 AM, Volker Hilsheimer wrote: > Does anyone other than developers of Qt (and for us this could be a real time > saver!) really need and benefit from this? I’d rather not want to ask our > support team to support customers and users with a colorful blend of moc and > library versions. This here describes a use case from a packager perspective: https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2021-September/041746.html Joerg _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
