> On 30 Jun 2022, at 08:32, Alex Blasche <alexander.blas...@qt.io> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> On Behalf Of >> Tuukka Turunen >> We could move the authorative maintainer list to be a QUIP instead of a Wiki >> page. > > While I support Volker's desire to remove the double accounting, I am not > sure that moving the list from the wiki to a quip would provide any gain. The > wiki works well and has proven itself. By comparison, the maintainer list > changes far more frequently than the average quip. I always considered quips > as a set of rules guiding our project rules. The maintainer list is more like > a config file for the project.
There might be value in having a better review process for modifications to the authoritative maintainer list (I believe anyone with a Qt account can edit the wiki). Something version controlled via gerrit might be a good idea. Indeed, it does go a bit beyond the documented [0] purpose of QUIPs, but perhaps cranking out a new repository for a single file is also a bit "over the top". [0] http://quips-qt-io.herokuapp.com/quip-0001.html Anyway, that’s a bit tangential to the topic at hand. But since we are here: if anyone has additional notes from the “Ghost Maintainers” session at the recent Qt Contributors Summit, please add them to: https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Contributors_Summit_2022_-_Program/Ghost_Maintainers Volker _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
