This will be documented in the qdoc manual as well, see https://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qt6-dev/13-qdoc-commands-topics.html#fn-command
In the generated class reference, the hidden friend will appear as a 'related non-member'. \topi ________________________________ From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilshei...@qt.io> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 11:28:58 PM To: Macieira, Thiago <thiago.macie...@intel.com> Cc: development@qt-project.org <development@qt-project.org> Subject: Re: [Development] qdoc help needed: it isn't seeing a function that is clearly there > On 25 Jul 2022, at 21:27, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > > In https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/422690 > Build: > https://testresults.qt.io/coin/integration/qt/qtbase/tasks/1658767511 > > /home/qt/work/qt/qtbase/src/corelib/kernel/qmetatype.cpp:3032: (qdoc) warning: > clang couldn't find function when parsing \fn int qRegisterMetaType(QMetaType > meta) > > The function exists because it's unit-tested and compiled. Why can't qdoc see > it? It's a hidden friend, but that's valid C++ and clang should see it. Hi Thiago, In clang’s AST, hidden friends are placed like class member functions, so they have to be documented like class members, e.g. \fn int QMetaType::qRegisterMetaType(QMetaType meta) This is misleading in this case, and outright invalid C++ in case of operators as hidden friends, but it works with the latter, and I expect it will make it work with this as well. Volker _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
