A. Pönitz wrote:
> [And since we are at it: It would ease my life (but possibly hamper the
> life of my cardiologist) if you wouldn't call it "Qt NIH API". This is
> an open insult to people who actively designed these APIs _with
> different goals_ than the STL. I personally think it's completely fine
> if you don't agree with these different goals, but then please accept
> that these goals exist, too]
Not to mention that some of the Qt APIs actually predate their STL
equivalent, making the STL version the NIH one.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
