On Monday, 14 November 2022 08:22:44 PST Marc Mutz via Development wrote: > Can we agree that NOI for setters is a no-brainer? Then 90% of the > usefulness of NOI can already be reaped, in a BC and SC manner. There's > pretty little we can do with return values before Qt 7, except use the > stuff in private APIs to try it out. But we can and should convert > setters already.
Not without conditions. I can agree with that so long as it doesn't remove the ability to add the owning equivalent as overload, even if it is a Q_WEAK_OVERLOAD, where it benefits because the target code is going to store anyway. I don't think we will ever change return types. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
