On Friday, 13 January 2023 08:06:23 PST Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote: > That's not what `inline` is for. Did you try doing a static build, and > enable a sufficiently aggressive LTO?
Please note that C inline works differently from C++ inline. In C, if the compiler decides not to inline the function, it will place an call to the out-of-line version of this function, but it won't define it for you. It's up to the implementer to define it somewhere, in the most functional form they want it. It need not be the same as the one that the original caller saw and it's not an ODR violation. static inline in C is closer to C++'s inline. It's the same as C++'s static inline, actually. Which means that any out-of-line copies that were emitted will not be merged by the linker. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
