Hi,
while gerrit _didn't_ have support for it, that changed in 3.7. It needs
to be manually enabled
(https://www.gerritcodereview.com/3.7.html#mention-user-support), but
maybe that would be a good way forward?
Fabian
On 02.05.23 11:00, Volker Hilsheimer via Development wrote:
With Qt 6.5, it’s been a struggle to get people to respond and follow-up to
comments made during the header review process.
Gerrit doesn’t really care about @user-style mentioning in comments, even
though is seems that some people assume that it does. Creating JIRA tickets is
the official way of doing it, but creating a ticket just to get someone’s
attention to input (which might or might not require a change) seems
heavy-handed. Ultimately, lots of people will be on cc or review of the
respective header-review gerrit change, so everything becomes everyone’s
problem.
Maintainers have a special responsibility during header review, but esp with
qtbase that is also a lot of people.
What can we do to make this a better process that doesn’t end up with changes
being made very late (with 6.5 we had some the day before the release
candidate, IIRC)?
Volker
--
Fabian Kosmale
Manager R&D
The Qt Company GmbH
Erich-Thilo-Str. 10
D-12489 Berlin
fabian.kosm...@qt.io
+49 1638686070
--
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development