On 04.05.23 19:35, André Somers wrote: [...] > Other fallout would be that currently A, B, and C will most often > include E in their name. That makes for the code becoming > > E::EA, E::EB, E::EC or E::AE, E::BE, E::CE. I don't like that. Do you > think there also is tooling to go to a renamed version w/o the enum > name? Or would it be feasible to add such tooling?
Since the rename is specific to the enum at hand, there's no hope that such tooling exists today. However, simple semantic symbol replacement is an easy thing to implement in clang-tidy, yes. That could be accompanied by Thiago's memory_order trick and Q_DECL_DEPRECATED. Thanks, Marc -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@qt.io> Principal Software Engineer The Qt Company Erich-Thilo-Str. 10 12489 Berlin, Germany www.qt.io Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Jouni Lintunen Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
