El jueves, 24 de agosto de 2023 13:09:18 -03 Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development escribió: > On 24/08/2023 17:36, Volker Hilsheimer wrote: > > > > On platforms where Qt is a system library, being able to at least launch > > your application if the system has a lower patch level than what the binary > > was built against sounds nice. But in practice, it’s rolling dice - the > > application might work fine; or it might get fatally hit by one of the > > not-yet-fixed bugs. > > I'm kind of sceptical that this actually happens in practice. If I > distribute a Qt application with the idea that an user can run it using > their distribution-provided Qt, I'd just use the same distribution to > compile the application to begin with (= the very same version for Qt) > or an earlier release of the distribution (= earlier minor version of Qt). > > It seems very unlikely that one would end up building for Qt x.y.z and > then have their users on Qt x.y.(w<z).
With my Debian hat on: I really don't recall this happening ever. Having an app compiled against an older Qt version is just normal, but the other way around... definitely not.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
