On 9/14/23 07:20, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> If TEST_posix_shm = TRUE and TEST_posix_sem = TRUE and TEST_sysv_shm
= FALSE
> and TEST_sysv_sem = FALSE, why is ipc_posix not TRUE?
That's a bug in the condition evaluator (QTBUG-117053), but we can work
around it: https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/503980
> Would be also nice if someone could confirm whether QT_IPC_POSIX was
defined in
> 6.5 for QNX. I expect it was, and the way this is now it's changing
> compatibility.
Looks like it was defined.
From the last successful 6.5 integration of
qnx-710-x86_64-developer-build-on-linux:
$ rg QT_POSIX_IPC
install/target/include/QtCore/qtcore-config.h
91:#define QT_POSIX_IPC
--
Jörg Bornemann | The Qt Company
--
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
