On Wednesday, 21 February 2024 08:26:52 PST Jøger Hansegård via Development 
wrote:
> Our Qt coding conventions (https://wiki.qt.io/Coding_Conventions) has a
> statement on the use of unnamed (anonymous) namespaces. As far as I
> understand, this statement is now outdated. Can we delete this statement
> and lean on Cpp Core Guidelines Cpp Core Guidelines SF.22 instead
> https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Rs-unnamed2?
> Or do we need a Qt specific guideline on this topic?

There doesn't seem to be a semantic difference. Are you proposing we simply 
replace our wording to point to SF22 or am I missing something?

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

Reply via email to