On 2025-12-10 14:44, Vladimir Minenko via Development wrote:
On 10. Dec 2025, at 14:08, André Somers via Development
<[email protected]> wrote:
So... QtBridges that don't expose qt, but only allow you to make
something talking to QML.
to Qt Quick via QML from my perspective and IMHO.
Does that mean your message is now that Qt is just QML, and the rest
of it doesn't really matter?
Not at all! Our message should be understood as: Qt is not only C++,
QML and Python (via bindngs like PySide). It is not only that, it is more.
Long term, we would like to even find ways how bring languages and C++
being even at the same time. So that Qt will be seen more and more as
a language-indepedent framework.
Some day, we also want to find ways how to involve folks from
https://wiki.qt.io/Language_Bindings so that over time, it becomes a
wider effort and exploration
Just checking if I understood the message correctly, of course.
I’m glad you do. And I miss more voices from outside of The Group :-)
—
Vladimir
Any plans for a Rust bridge?
--
Development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
