Volatile? Den tors 21 maj 2026 13:08Edward Welbourne via Development < [email protected]> skrev:
> Artem Dyomin (21 May 2026 12:49) wrote: > > > Well, according to the input, the word "experimental" brings messages > > regarding temporary status and transferring to public API in the future, > > that doesn't fit well to some cases. To address this, I'd rather choose > > the word that reflects its semiprivate status and limited compatibility > > guarantees. > > > > * protected - for me, it doesn't sound clear in terms of headers > > * limited_compat - looks good, but doesn't reflect private status > > * semiprivate - perhaps better as it reflects what it does > > > > So, what about "semiprivate"? > > It's a half-way decent answer. > One other name springs to mind, more apt at least than "protected", but > likewise inspired by terms from C++: "mutable" - after all, we're > talking about APIs on which we don't promise compatibility - they may > change from one release to the next. > > Eddy. > -- > Development mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development >
-- Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
