On Monday, 27 July 2026 04:50:49 Pacific Daylight Time Volker Hilsheimer via Development wrote: > Ok; it then seems reasonable for the next step to be a cleaning up of > in-tree code, see what we can learn from that (if anything; tests can > perhaps get away with s/path()/paths().first()?), and only deprecate once > we have a clean source tree ourselves and a good porting guideline.
The libraries are already all free of it. The problem are examples and tests. I asked the question because I noticed just how much there is of it and I don't intend to fix them all. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Principal Engineer - Intel DCG - Platform & Sys. Eng.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
