-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Werner,
nothing new about the fact that our friends of the walled garden in Cupertino don't do UAProf's and as we all equally well know they don't do decent UA-strings "neither" : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13248493/detect-ipad-mini-in-html5 etc (have you seen the one that explains who to 'detect' the gyroscope specs of iPads using javascript and then 'detect' a mini...the mind boggles) ;-) If our fruity friends in Cupertino think, like The Big Satan in Redmond once did, that UAProf's, decent UA-strings and 'standards' are not their 'thing', that is their deal but it is by no means an 'excuse' for the open www, open source (ASF) to abide by their 'dictate'. "Market leaders" come and go and it seems to me that it is up to us -- open source, standards etc -- to keep The Thing going despite that and well beyond them ! So basically, 'xcuse my French : fuck 'm ! I am deeply convinced we would do well to keep UAprof and other, however flawed 'standards' in and at the forefront to signal the open www's commitment to open and full compliance and if nothing else to put to shame those who make bazzilions of the standards, poor deluded dom quixote schmucks like yours truly have been putting in for well over 20 years now. And after IE6 did we not all say "nie wieder" ? The Apple-issue, Oracle with Java and WebKit going viral...deja-vu all over again ? All in good spirit, Regards, esjr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRH8wgAAoJEOxywXcFLKYchOoIAJAqjcR6AwFJSIiY3LroRQ7o FW48UG+eFTtEH7mchmPIULOZq9kalrXtxNFqtStfpx2OUptfzLqP8wTcRnS1p0fd +s1RtlUz0qLsXIS980l67PKuPBw1nIT4wkqjxk2Io4sZ1/TpYezBj+8tLah5pwZt m/l9cTYGdfguUekTnZPR9l8qGb/hAYFZhi2DHzEIeNplCRR6us2M3/f3nxZcr829 nu+uZTFlSSbc31MXVskU5+WwCmUbl9Y0XX22/8WcZe13WXqtFAFnOVLdcvsDdNpU NXMYSwab2/6LPz5dg9NRLa8AgOd2a6KAmTUwfWsJzPEcK419YnB/UVjVE0p+h6k= =Mtky -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
