Reza, Thanks a lot for your interest. I'm afraid, without the actual device or a reliable emulator, I cannot tell, neither for Firefox OS nor ChromeOS, although there should be a few notebooks out there already with that OS by now.
As mentioned in my OpenDDR presentations like this one http://www.slideshare.net/keilw/openddr OpenDDR considers 3 aspects: - Physical Device - OS - Browser Thus while the browser may remain Chrome or Firefox or even still say something like "Mozilla" for most, the physical device and/or OS will vary in each of those cases. Given the client API for C# and Java is so far modeled closely after OpenDDR, that also applies to DeviceMap for most parts. Regards, Werner On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Reza Naghibi <[email protected]>wrote: > Werner, can you re explain the implications of this, for my understanding? > > So you are saying that this os can encompass both devices, tablets, and > desktops? They will support popular browsers like chrome and firefox? Will > these browsers expose a device name in the UA? What will change? > > Can you maybe give me some examples of what we could see in the wild? > > In dclass, I have started to go down the road where os detection is a > separate index than device detection. > > --- > Sent from Blackberry Bold 9900 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:13:07 > To: <[email protected]> > Reply-To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Test Data > > Another indicator, why Web-based Mobile OS are likely to become stronger > very soon, especially in what used to be "Feature Phones" and their > replacements by cheaper devices than full-scale Android or Apple devices[?] > > So we're looking at potentially *a very large number*, if Firefox or Chrome > OS are spread across the world... > > http://readwrite.com/2013/02/25/mozillas-firefox-os-smartphones-unveiled-at-mobile-world-congress > > Werner > >
