>> find a way to coordinate your reworking of the java code ... with .NET Definitely. I will be doing it in stages and the core algorithm will be the last one. So I will keep you (and everyone else) updated on the status.
>> 'time-taken' value in ms on the demo page This is taken from Javascript in the browser, so it’s the complete round trip. >> I'm planning an article on the implementation of DeviceMap I would love to help out where needed. Just let me know. -----Original Message----- From: eberhard speer jr. Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 10:53 PM To: Apache Device Map DEV Subject: DeviceMap and java -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Reza, all, like the demo. The XHR offers some interesting perspectives for future API implementations. I'm 'reworking' the .Net OpenDDR/Miri-fork to contribute to the DeviceMap code-base. As matter stand now, with the exception of the Miri-fork's ability to connect to various 'data-sources' (XML, JSON, Redis, SQL) it's core (parsing and identification) is essentially identical to the current C# code. (some change made for CLI-compliance) It would be nice if we could find a way to coordinate your reworking of the java code with that so that any improvements and changes you make to the java code are reflected in the .Net version. That way both versions remain 'in sync' from the point of view of core functionality. Reza, with regard to "performance", I see a 'time-taken' value in ms on the demo page. It would be nice to know 'where' this is measured. I mean, in my demo of the .Net version the ms value reflects only the 'resolver' time. This obviously makes things look 'good' but is a bit of a cheat because it does not count the time it takes to generate the rest of the 'response'. Also : I'm planning an article on the implementation of DeviceMap currently running on my servers here. The idea is to gather my thoughts and maybe in the process, drum up some attention for DeviceMap and possible implementations. It will include details on how the "integration code" Reza mentions is implemented here. I'm thinking of putting the finished article up on my Google+ thingie - -- might as well use it now that I have it -- and drop a line to the 'usual suspects' (DZone, HN, Slashdot,...) but if any of you know of a better place to publish and publicize it, do let me know. Maybe a review of the draft by some members here would be useful and advisable too. Finally, it would be nice to have an 'official' DeviceMap site for the .Net version. I have a full demo site with additional tools (described earlier) nearly ready (the proverbial 90%). I don't know what Apache's resources in this area are nor what the policies are but I have no problem dedicating one of the servers here to the task and ensure privileged access for members in addition to making the demos and general content available to the public. Looking forward to your comments etc, esjr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRr/msAAoJEOxywXcFLKYcp24H/3PtE8U3zx/V4TEHbH6kPvPx cpxDuA3//Pe8NMKaev1bWuez/2MqvfuAhKVQGWFKmOTc7gJodjc22x0Rx8ZRHSud GuFGmboZwiE2UgKPO+ZvbazcBFTVfJITehIfUqTka4VCcA0uQNrHUUnP9zjlNt5f EcV1JmhLZMzn+90k/PhRS656cGgjSbSUoKrp0QgtJzeV4835kR+QCi9ww0VjV43E AFIiQLDzqBXWfYJJXi3na30IIH9bijHqxknB8+exjnQY1T9OQtDXRE/jmACT/Sz/ TUgfuFEsfTqZVTjS8WrwlGzEF1mwn8oBV/ePfIhSwLqi9MZQ9gdpKJm3wk/IxK8= =xCIP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
