Hi, Sounds good. We should get both test coverage and tests that pass to an acceptable level. I have not looked for Webmontag or similar events, but both that and maybe a local Web Developer conference (is there no ApacheCon next year?) are on my horizon for next year. I may be among the few JCP and JavaEE EG members who suggested Java EE 8 did a little more for Mobile Web Development, the question was asked by the Spec Leads, and I said it should, also hinting existing W3C standards like DDR and projects around it could be used for that, offering a free/affordable "RI" if you want, while commercial vendors are still welcome to provide alternatives, even if some of them either perform lousy, cost a fortune or both[?]
Happy Holidays, Werner On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:42 AM, eberhard speer jr. <[email protected]> > wrote: > > ...New year's resolution for DeviceMap : release next year ?... > > Yeah, sorry that I didn't follow up on that. My issue for the java > module is that I don't want to release with so many failing tests, the > RefDataTest - TODO that you see when building with "mvn clean install" > at the top of our source code tree. > > The simplest way to fix that is probably to expand [1] with the values > that we currently expect, even if they are not ideal. I meant to do > that but didn't find time yet, if someone wants to have a shot at that > please do! > > -Bertrand > > [1] data/test-data/src/main/resources/test-data/dmap_20130522.txt >
