-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
my 2 cents : I agree with Reza. It seems to me the code can be polished, re-polished and tweaked, the issue is, as it was : the data. The evolution there is that there appears to be general consensus on the fact that DeviceMap will have to maintain its own data and that the it's main source is the OpenDDR contributions. The fact that I have the 'infrastructure' [code, db ,site, not the bandwidth] for such maintenance is not really relevant : it's .Net and I continue to think that for me to 'publish' such a thing, while actively involved in getting DeviceMap going, well...that's just not cricket, is it. And like Reza, I remain committed to the DeviceMap project. Unlike Reza I have more time I can commit, so I can get the .Net 'clone' ready with the "paperwork" etc. With regard to the data maintenance infrastructure, I have data, models and a list of does-and-donts [stuff I ran into] I'll gladly share. esjr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTrbCbAAoJEOxywXcFLKYcI3UH/3zzABExVBHrHbMRk/nOQv8A 3lL+XaIoQehCcMOXeQe1KCxRT7rjxPreFEN4wmi9DKRC8DG1p/ph2wsqzTsApxT8 B3IvXanvKTjKzlTDfCg/cOxYPdYOYXz6wfJLLqGyLOJA6FJkQ6raqcwY8ATNpdYU ln8D0f/IMgiIAn/SfEIunEg5CDq4WE3VyArbXiHltbmcFNwy1AxnFPny7JgaFicp KS8zywHZ4KPgpX1VZchsGttMI96GRfRnoTn+5mky621MAhUTOS0tvm4HKBS+vOwu 9A8FVX2D3GnmfjEnXcIUGRjBMMpYpdVxd3oYyLONTGz8POvtqOsFIa8xBEYIJP0= =PZx2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
