Last but not least, I can only perform the same actions as before in JIRA. Commenting on any ticket, closing those I reported myself, but even those I can't assign to anybody else but the person it's assigned to. Is this supposed to be only Bertrand who can make assignments?
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote: > P.s.: In case of "devicemap-simpleddr" part of the artifact name also > matches the actual subfolder under "java". > For "classifier" that's no longer the case, so worth a thought if renaming > the artifactId also should be done with the folder/module name[?] > > Besides, I don't see a strong value in exposing XMLParser in a separate > package and public class. It is currently used only by private methods > inside DDRLoader, so couldn't the class be package local in its package? > There is no reusable "Parser" functionality seen from the class so far, so > hiding it from the public API seems better. Otherwise it becomes part of > 1.0 and anything we expose now could be used, so it's hard to remove later. > Making it public later if required is easier on the other hand[?] > > WDYT? > > Werner > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I codenamed it "devicemap-java-classifier", but used the then common OSGi >> alike artifactId. >> >> "devicemap-java-api", "devicemap-java-client" or even either of those >> without the "java" seems OK. If the W3C Simple DDR functionality could be >> 100% available within that artifact, there may not be need for a >> second/alternate API in the future, as of now, it doesn't seem to provide >> any of that, so "devicemap-simpleddr" (or with a "-java" if we want to do >> that consistently?[?]) also has perfect justification. The only reason >> why it isn't automatically built is the lack of a proper Maven-compliant >> JAR, see prior message. >> >> Werner >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Reza <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Right now the java api is called "devicemap-java" and its in the >>> "org.apache.devicemap" package. Not sure if this is a good name because the >>> "java" is redundant since the artifact is in a java repo manager. I was >>> thinking of calling it "devicemap-api" or "devicemap-client" or maybe >>> "devicemap-java-api"??? Thoughts? >>> >>> Not a big deal if we change it later since we are still 1.0, but would >>> like to get things straight before the 1st release. >>> >>> The data repo is "devicemap-data" and I think thats a well suited >>> artifact id. >> >> >> >
