See DeviceAtlas, I don't agree that dropping W3C compliance on the Java side is correct.
If you want to create a "new WURFL", sure, go ahead let's drop it, but if we prefer to stay compatible with the de facto market leader here (plus one or two alternatives, semi-open like MaDDR or completely open like OpenDDR) we should maintain W3C support like they do. Werner On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:51 PM, eberhard speer jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > the .Net W3C implementation follows the > http://www.w3.org/TR/DDR-Simple-API/ specs, to the letter. > > Like Reza, I think it's nice to have but not vital to this release. > And some kind of integration with DeviceMap still needs to happen. > > > esjr > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTvWUPAAoJEOxywXcFLKYc5WQH+we0ZTLfsxRhWzqpNhHj+p+k > anT2nfXK0iwz6va1VInHKEEuULMQD/FFPP33GrAj/dV4KHAKNB4w67G9TB0RcIhz > 3Y2YPtg5eLSnOyY1O6+2ncCR/PwU7Sn78V5XKrWpaxWVcLmVSt1uCvOxUXG3KZhJ > 8Jn9K2N5XiYfH+KI3JWWZhFvPu1eE6m5aS2fyEJiq3B0XfqmmiTYMa/iY/+B/Cha > SdLBBVGpIWVt/RpLqdZou0XjXwvzb/b74SGr9l0fBQA2zjDB7D9PXRAz8PbV6h96 > 8NRE2DWPL4aBxBKr1XHp1NKG8ccrbK/hf5oSnwygO2vWSyK+c4He58PCwnxe2Ec= > =GSP4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
