Hi, I tagged the devicemap-data content after getting version and other meta-data corrected: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/devicemap/tags/data/1.0.0
The structure underneath is like the latest "openddr" tags, so in theory we may add "test-data" to it if it still applies, otherwise to another release. Have a look at how you want to tag the https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/devicemap/tags/devicemap subtree. Either using the "java" and other folders or putting all of them under a common "1.0.0" release. Or adding a prefix like "java-", "vb-", etc. before the 1.0.0. Werner On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote: > SVN tags here > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/devicemap/tags/devicemap > > The name space is up to how we want to do this underneath each "component" > (hence the suggestion someone who can do this in JIRA might add actual > components for "Java", ".NET" or VB/CSharp and "Data", so far only Bertrand > and for some credentials like change assigneee Reza are in the right > group/role) > > "data" had a snapshot for each OpenDDR update I synced. Reza missed 1.27, > but as we plan to draft a 1.0.0 milestone release, that can be done via the > release tag anyway. > So I'd do this for > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/devicemap/tags/data/1.0.0 > > Ideally all other tags should be similar. The naming convention is totally > different for every single Apache project. > > For a "flat" structure using only the top-level "tags" folder, many > projects chose something like /tags/devicemap-data-1.0.0. > > If you prefer, let's do that for ALL artifacts like that, otherwise just > "1.0.0" or "v1.0.0" are the other patterns. See "CouchDB" using a simple > "1.0.0", etc. "DeltaCloud" put a "release-" in front of every tag, so there > is no mandatory pattern by Apache Foundation, only a common agreement > inside each team it seems... > > If we use the > /tags/data > /tags/devicemap > > structure, then either > /tags/devicemap/java-1.0.0 > /tags/devicemap/csharp-1.0.0 > ... > would work or > /tags/devicemap/java/1.0.0 > /tags/devicemap/csharp/1.0.0 > > I'll leave the decision in the .NET and Java corner to what we like best. > > I used "v1.x" under /data/openddr to match the exact same tag OpenDDR used > in Git. > No distinct preference here, but for /tags/data will do a simple 1.0.0 for > now. > As of now, "test-data" did not seem in the archive, and you did not sound > too eager to include it with a 1.0.0 release right now, is that correct? > > Werner > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:56 PM, eberhard speer jr. <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Ooops, lost me there "tagged" ? >> >> esjr >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ >> >> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTvbqXAAoJEOxywXcFLKYctb4H/RJwOLzIjoFKcvRQIkN04uZC >> DjJGSayj8youkYwAMLY9AsM67osZfJkn0gCiXf+5Phpk5K9/PUJ5Qz8x3x5iizGe >> a/CQUXuVNyt/zRHXwc85lzuN+6FfC5uGsMGtbDFnf6Wm0ijBfEy3FZBAhHmdZFqB >> X774m9mI3URQWgqysoiip6UwZ64QKWdLth4KK0Ivyu02iMCwpQey5fWNgCIUvlp0 >> c8SlkfvLy+n7xMEAQCjfgbh6E778tng7S2Ukurtowyfz83c/tyi/L/n+abEBEjMR >> F1OkW/SmJZZ3H9Skocq8G78PoCelWzd3JeAlJlmwTS10agF18kEAtJ9oEq67k3I= >> =e42w >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > >
